Legal Opinion

Kellenbenz v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 1983No. Appeal, No. 594 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

This is an appeal from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirming an order of the referee and holding Philip Kellenbenz (Claimant) ineligible for benefits under the provisions of Section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess. P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.'S. §802 (b), because he voluntarily terminated his employment without 'cause of necessitous and compelling nature.

The Claimant’s sole basis of appeal here is .that the Board erred in determining .that Claimant voluntarily…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eckenrod v. Unempl. Comp. Bd. of Rev.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Pease v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Miller v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Querry v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Monaco v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEWSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Burke v. Board of ReviewAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. K. Franklin v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Monaco v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEWSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API