Legal Opinion

Employment Division v. Ring

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 19, 1990No. 89-AB-1604; CA A63480PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Employment Division (Division) appeals a final order of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) that allowed claimant to retain her unemployment compensation benefits. The issue is whether Division may recover unemployment benefits that were paid to a private sector employee during a period for which the employee subsequently received back pay.1 We affirm.

Claimant was fired from her job at Central City Concern (Central), a private, nonprofit corporation. While pursuing a wrongful discharge grievance against Central, she applied for and received unemployment benefits. Seven weeks later, she found…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Seibel v. Liberty Homes, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. v. State Unemployment Compensation CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Filter v. City of VernoniaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. North Pacific Supply Co. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stone Forest Industries, Inc. v. BowlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Childers Meat Co. v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Nickerson v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API