Legal Opinion

Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. v. State Unemployment Compensation Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1959PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

The defendants Verlin I. Kaufman, Glen Ross, and Joseph P. Powers (hereinafter referred to as “claimants”) were in the employment of the Weyerhaeuser Timber Company (hereinafter referred to as “petitioner”). They were members of the defendant Union (hereinafter referred to as the “Union”) and their employment was covered by a working agreement made and entered into on their behalf by the Union with the petitioner. This agreement, insofar as material, reads as follows:

“ARTICLE IX — HOLIDAYS
“(A) The following holidays shall be observed: Memorial Day, Fourth of July, Labor Day, Thanks giving…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Creameries of America, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Journal Publishing Co. v. State Unemployment Compensation CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Erickson v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  5. General Motors Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Parker v. GeraceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. Oregon-Pacific Forest Products Corp. v. Welsh Panel Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1965
  3. Taylor v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Autwell v. State Department of Industrial RelationsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  5. Employment Division v. RingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API