Legal Opinion

Hazel v. Prudential Financial, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 9, 2023No. 3:22-cv-07465Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TYRONE HAZEL, et al., Case No. 22-cv-07465-CRB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS 14 PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs Tyrone Hazel, Roxane Evans, Valerie Torres, and Rhonda Hyman allege 17 that Prudential Financial employed a software provider, ActiveProspect (together, 18 “Defendants”) to collect their information without their consent as they sought a life 19 insurance quote. See Am. Compl. (dkt. 18). Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Frizell Clegg v. Cult Awareness Network Cult Awareness Network, Los Angeles Chapter Cynthia Kisser Priscilla CoatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API