Legal Opinion
City of Charlotte v. Cook
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided May 8, 1998No. 83PA97Published
1Opinion of the Court
498 S.E.2d 605 (1998)
348 N.C. 222
The CITY OF CHARLOTTE
v.
J. Ernest COOK; and wife, Ruby H. Cook.
The CITY OF CHARLOTTE
v.
J. Ernest COOK; and wife, Ruby H. Cook; and Crescent Electric Membership Corporation.
No. 83PA97.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
May 8, 1998.
Office of the City Attorney by H. Michael Boyd, Senior Deputy City Attorney, and R. Susanne Knox, Assistant City Attorney, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellant.
Bailey, Patterson, Caddell, Hart & Bailey, P.A. by Allen A. Bailey and H. Morris Caddell, Jr., Charlotte, for defendant-appellees J. Ernest Cook and Ruby H. Cook.
Crisp, Page & Currin,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Charlotte v. McNeelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Raleigh & Gaston Rail Road v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1837
- Town of Morganton v. Hutton & Bourbonnais Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Brest v. Jacksonville Expressway AuthorityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Den on Demise of the Trustees of the University v. FoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1805
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.