Marriage of Porter v. Porter
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
James Porter appeals from an order requiring him to pay $5,257, the amount of a contract for deed payment due him, to the court administrator for payment to respondent. The funds are to be applied toward satisfaction of three judgments respondent has against appellant for unpaid maintenance.
Appellant claims the trial court erred in ordering the proceeds to be paid to the court administrator without prior supplementary proceedings. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant James Porter and respondent Margaret Porter were married in 1950. The marriage was dissolved early in 1980. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fox v. Capital Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Faus v. FausSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Courtney v. CourtneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Knapp v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Albrecht v. AlbrechtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. KoppiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011