Legal Opinion
Labbe v. Pension Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 20, 1996No. 15275PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The dispositive issues in this appeal are whether: (1) the trial court, Freed, J., properly granted a motion by the defendants, the Hartford pension commission (commission) and the city of Hartford (city), to dismiss the case against them for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; and (2) the trial court, Aurigemma, J., properly set aside a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs and rendered judgment for the defendant, the Hartford police union (union). The plaintiffs,1 Allen J. Labbe, *171John Murdock, John D. Raphael, Geriy Pleasent and Eddie M. Rivera, appeal from both of those judgments. With…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Purzycki v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Torres v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Corcoran v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Howard v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Russo v. City of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.