Tomick v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
**472 In this certified appeal, we consider whether General Statutes § 46a-104 1 provides for an award of statutory punitive damages as a remedy for discriminatory practices under the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act (act), General Statutes § 46a-51 et seq. The plaintiff, Michael Tomick, appeals, upon our grant of his petition for certification, 2 from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the trial court's decision to set aside a jury award of $500,000 in statutory punitive damages against the defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. 3
**473 Tomick v. United Parcel Service, Inc.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hoy v. AngeloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Denise Travis v. Gary Community Mental Health Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Skakel v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Presidential Village, LLC v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Burns v. AdlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Heyward v. Judicial Dep't of Conn.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Marchesi v. Bd. of Selectmen of the Town of LymeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.