Legal Opinion

Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. Till

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 12, 1991No. 1 CA-CV 90-430PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEVI RAY HAIRE, Retired Judge.

On this appeal we must determine whether an automobile liability insurance policy issued by Farmers Insurance Company (Farmers) covered injuries the defendant, Heather Till, sustained when attacked by a dog while in the covered vehicle. The trial court ruled that there was no coverage and granted Farmers’ motion for summary judgment.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The material facts are not disputed. Heather Till was waiting for her fiance to finish work at a restaurant in Flagstaff. While there, she met Linus Neinstadt and Jill Peterson. Till and Peterson…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brenner v. Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  2. Mason v. Celina Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  3. National Indemnity Co. v. CorboDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  4. Vanguard Insurance Company v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  5. Columbia Southern Chemical Corp. v. Manufacturers & Wholesalers Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McCarthy Bros. Co. v. Continental Lloyds Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  2. Farmers Union Cooperative Insurance v. Allied Property & Casualty InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Regal Homes, Inc. v. CNA InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Colorado Casualty Insurance v. Safety Control Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. Heringlake v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API