Legal Opinion

Loudermilk v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 11, 1998No. 73232PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

Chet Loudermilk (Loudermilk) appeals the denial of post conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. He pled guilty to one count of second degree robbery, one count of attempted robbery, and one count of stealing a credit device. The motion court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing. We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing.

The state originally charged Loudermilk by indictment with: (1) the Class A felony of first degree robbery; (2) the Class B felony of attempted second degree robbery; and (3) the Class C felony of stealing a credit device. It amended the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. Hagan v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. Schellert v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  4. Edgington v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Rick v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Shackleford v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Whitehead v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Nesbitt v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Bryant v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Chaney v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API