Legal Opinion
Misegades & Douglas v. Schuyler
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided May 28, 1971No. Civ. A. No. 406-69-APublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
OREN R. LEWIS, District Judge.
The plaintiff asks this Court to enter an order requiring the Commissioner of Patents to permit them to examine Patent Office Form PO 892 used in the then pending Patent Application No. 666,526.
The plaintiff relies on 5 U.S.C. § 552 and 15 U.S.C. §§ 1511, 1512, 1513, 1515, 1517 and 1151-1157 in support of their right to inspect the document in question.
The Commissioner denied their request, citing 5 U.S.C. § 552(b) (3), (4) and (5), and 35 U.S.C. § 122 and Rule 14 (a) of the Patent Office Rules of Practice.
Upon examining the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
3Cited by6 opinions
- Misegades & Douglas v. William E. Schuyler, Jr., Commissioner of Patents, United States Patent OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- Irons v. GottschalkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. WenckeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Sears v. GottschalkDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1973
- Lee Pharmaceuticals v. Juanita M. Kreps, Secretary of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.