Legal Opinion

Misegades & Douglas v. William E. Schuyler, Jr., Commissioner of Patents, United States Patent Office

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 25, 1972No. 71-1763PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant instituted this action in the District Court pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552(a) (3), seeking to enjoin the Commissioner of Patents from withholding certain Patent Office documents. Appellant sought to examine a completed Patent Office Form PO 892, which was prepared in connection with Patent Application Serial No. 666,526.

The District Court, 328 F.Supp. 619, held that the Patent Office had correctly withheld this particular Form PO 892 from appellant because the form contained information concerning a pending application for a patent, and, therefore,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Local No. 8-6, Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Robert L. Ackerly v. Herbert L. Ley, JrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  3. Misegades & Douglas v. SchuylerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1971

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Michael Alan Crooker v. U. S. State DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  2. Sloan Ex Rel. State v. Friends of the Hunley, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Constangy, Brooks & Smith, by Larry W. Bridgesmith on Behalf of Teledyne Industries, Inc., D/B/A Teledyne Still-Man v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  4. Triestman v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  5. Irons v. GottschalkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API