Securities & Exchange Commission v. Wencke
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
Lee Pharmaceuticals (“Lee”), a patent applicant, brought this action to compel the Patent Office to produce abandoned patent applications under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552 (1977) and to consider such applications as evidence of prior art in evaluating Lee’s claims of patentability, under 35 U.S.C. § 131 (1970). Lee appeals from a judgment dismissing its complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We affirm, holding that (1) abandoned patent applications are not producible under FOIA because section 122 of the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bell v. Inland Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- Northeast Savings, F.A. v. Plymouth Commons Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- United States v. One Lot of U.S. Currency Totalling $506,537.00District Court, S.D. Florida · 1986
- Bell v. Inland Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Walter Wencke, the Butt Trust, the Sailor Trust, the Grape Institute Trust, the Grape Institute, Inc., Irreatum, Inc., Securities and Exchange Commission v. Walter Wencke, and Time-Lenders, Inc., Securities and Exchange Commission v. Walter Wencke, and Cathryn Wencke and Time-Lenders, Inc., Securities and Exchange Commission v. Walter Wencke, and San Diego Environmental Charitable Trust, Hawksfoot, Ltd., Zippe Ltd., Rinn Corp., Securities & Exchange Commission v. Walter Wencke, Cathryn Wencke, Santa Fe Financial, Time-LendersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978