Legal Opinion

State v. Kell

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 28, 2000No. 24550-7-IIPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

On January 29, 1998, a district court jury tried Edith M. Kell for driving under the influence (DUI). As far as we can tell from the record, the jury was allowed to separate during trial and deliberations.

The jury began deliberating at a time the record does not show. At about 5:15 P.M., while deliberations were ongoing, a juror asked permission to make a phone call from the court’s phone. While speaking with the bailiff, she mentioned that one or more jurors had been using a cell phone in the jury room. At about 5:30 P.M., after conferring with the judge, the bailiff told the jurors they…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. FauberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  3. State v. HawkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  5. State v. RoseWashington Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. LindsayWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. In Re WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. DepazWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. DepazWashington Supreme Court · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API