Legal Opinion
Lamontagne v. Pension Plan of United Wire, Metal & Machine Pension Fund
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 24, 1989No. 510, Docket 88-7703PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Circuit Judge:
Joseph L. Lamontagne appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Judge Mary Johnson Lowe, which dismissed his complaint on the grounds (1) that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over his Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) claims and (2) that his Taft-Hartley Act claim was time-barred. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
The Pension Plan (“the Plan”) of the United Wire, Metal & Machine Pension Fund (“the Fund”), as amended through 1970, in Article I, § 7, defines “Covered Employment” as employment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thomas Menhorn v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- In re the Estate of BarabashNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Harris Cohen v. Martin's, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Baum v. NolanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miele v. Pension Plan of New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement FundDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Lamontagne v. Pension Plan Of The United Wire, Metal & Machine Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989