Legal Opinion
Joset M. Cizek v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 15, 1992No. 91-1053PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This matter comes on for consideration of appellee’s motion for publication of the order and judgment entered November 14, 1991.
Upon consideration whereof, the motion for publication is granted. The judgment entered November 14, 1991 is vacated. Our mandate is recalled. The order and judgment, filed November 14, 1991, is published as modified. The mandate shall reissue forthwith.
BARRETT, Senior Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Marilyn Wheeler v. Main HurdmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Anna Mae R. Henderson v. United States of America, Anne Marie Henderson, by Her Guardian Ad Litem, Anna Marie R. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Three-M Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Frank Nitty Walden, II v. Gerald T. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Trinity Broadcasting of Denver, Inc. v. City of WestminsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Melvin Kanar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Donato Dalrymple v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Peter A. Kokaras and Diane Kokaras v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Staggs v. United States Ex Rel. Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.