Three-M Enterprises, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Three-M Enterprises, Inc. appeals the order of the district court of the District of Utah dismissing its suit against the government under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-80, for unlawful detainer. The district court dismissed the suit for lack of jurisdiction because plaintiff had failed to exhaust an administrative appeal since it had not filed a proper administrative claim within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a). For the reasons hereinafter stated we affirm the district court’s order dismissing this suit for lack of jurisdiction.
The dispute in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Stanley Bialowas, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, by William Sheppard, Insurance Commissioner v. National Association of Flood Insurers, an Unincorporated AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Best Bearings Co., an Illinois Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
3Cited by64 opinions
- Keene Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Judith Odin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Stephen Bradley v. United States of America, by Veterans AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Mrs. Verdie Mae Franklin Verdie Mae Franklin, Administratrix of the Estate of Lonnie B. Franklin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Raymond Lurch v. United States of America, Defendant-Third Party v. The Regents of the University of New Mexico and Ralph Kaplan, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.