Legal Opinion
Frank Nitty Walden, II v. Gerald T. Bartlett
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 1, 1988No. 86-2475PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURCIAGA, District Judge.
This appeal presents the issue of whether a military prisoner is barred from bringing a 28 U.S.C. § 1331 general federal question action seeking damages, declaratory, and injunctive relief for alleged due process violations by military officials. Plaintiff-Appellant, Frank Nitty Walden II, filed a pro se complaint alleging defendants-appellees violated his rights to due process by the manner in which they conducted disciplinary proceedings against him. Appellees are individual military officials. This appeal is from the district court’s dismissal of Walden’s case for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Elmer M. Kunkel, William H. Dennler, John D. Lockton, Ted B. Westfall and William D. Robertson v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Kenneth Eugene HaddockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- SK Finance SA v. La Plata County, Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Joset M. Cizek v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Williams Natural Gas Co. v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.