Legal Opinion
Isenberg v. Trent Trust Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 21, 1928No. 5193PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).
The controversy involves the liability of the appellee to account for 670 shares of the capital stock of the Kekaha Sugar Company, reported by the appellee to have been sold under the act known as the Trading with the Enemy Act, by the Alien Property Custodian, as property of beneficiaries of the estate of Otto Isenberg, deceased. The eireuit court found that the stock was part of the trust estate, and that at the time of the accounting it should have been in the appellee’s possession as trustee, and that it had been lost to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Central Union Trust Co. of NY v. GarvanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Stoehr v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Kahn v. GarvanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920
- Miller v. RouseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. SutherlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
3Cited by6 opinions
- Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. MarkhamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- Pflueger v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- In re the Estate of CarringtonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948
- Aldridge v. Franco-Wyoming Securities Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1943
- In re the Estate of SaalbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.