Legal Opinion
Scott's Liquid Gold, Inc. v. Lexington Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 14, 2002No. 00-1258PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff-Appellant Lexington Insurance Company (“Lexington”) appeals the district court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment and grant of partial summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee Scott’s Liquid Gold-Inc. (“Scott’s”). The district court ruled that Lexington had a duty to indemnify Scott’s for its liability relating to releases of environmental contaminants. Lexington also appeals the district court’s award of attorney fees to Scott’s. This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm the district court’s grant of partial summary…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hecla Mining Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Chacon v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Kim Hirase-Doi v. U.S. West Communications, Inc., and Kenneth ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Bennett v. Quark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. StarkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Advantage Homebuilding, LLC. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. EngidaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Hofer v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Hopeman Bros., Inc. v. Cont'l Cas. Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
- In the Interest of Delluomo v. CedarbladeColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.