Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Delluomo v. Cedarblade

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 10, 2014No. Court of Appeals No. 12CA2513PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JUDGE J. JONES

{1 Defendant, Brenda Cedarblade, appeals the district court's judgment entered on a jury verdict awarding attorney fees to plaintiffs, Phillip Delluomo and his conservator, Janice Eder, based on Ms. Cedarblade's breach of fiduciary duty. Because we conclude that the cireumstances of the case do not fit within any recognized exception to the "American rule"-requiring parties to pay their own legal expenses-we vacate the portion of the judgment awarding attorney fees.

I. Background

12 Mr. Delluomo created a revocable living trust. He named himself trustee and Wells Fargo…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Moses v. Diocese of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. Allstate Insurance Co. v. HuizarSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. Bernhard v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  5. Campbell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Donald C. Taylor and Margaret Ann Taylor TrustColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Autotech Technologies, LP v. Palmer Drives Controls and Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2025
  3. Blacklidge v. AndersonDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2025
  4. In re Donald C. Taylor and Margaret Ann Taylor TrustColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Murphy v. Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.District Court, D. Colorado · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API