Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Enid v. Yeoman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 3, 1904PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from the Disirici Court of, Garfield County; before . James K. Beauchamp, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burford, C. J.:

This was an action by E. E. Yeoman to recover the value of certain cattle alleged 'to have been unlawfully taken and converted by the. defendant. It appears that the father of the plaintiff below, one A. J. Yeoman, borrowed twenty-five hundred dollars from the First National Bank of Enid, and to secure the 'bank, executed a mortgage upon certain cattle. The note was not paid and the agents of the bank went' to' the pasture of E. E. Yeoman, in Woods county, and by the assistance of an officer, and against the objections and protests of the defendant in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bates v. PrebleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Fager v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Van Every v. FitzgeraldNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  4. State ex rel. Osborne v. ThorneNebraska Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ZickafooseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal. v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. McIntireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Sharp v. Pawhuska Ice Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Oklahoma Hay & Grain Co. v. T. D. Randall & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API