Legal Opinion

Van Every v. Fitzgerald

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1887PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Mitchell, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

On August 19, 1884, plaintiff filed a petition in court below, alleging in substance:

1st. That defendant is indebted to plaintiff for moving 20,000 cubic yards of dirt on section 25 of Kenesaw and Oxford branch of B. & M. R. R., at agreed price of 18 cents per cubic yard, amounting to $3,600.

2d. That on or,about February 1, 1884, plaintiff and defendant entered into contract by which plaintiff was to do the clearing, grubbing, and grading of section 25 of said railroad work, to be commenced on or before March 1, 1884, and done by July 1, 1884.

If in judgment of engineer plaintiff was not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martin v. ScottNebraska Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Security Co. v. GraybealSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  2. Labaree v. KlostermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  3. First National Bank of Enid v. YeomanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  4. Small v. PoffenbargerNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Pollard v. TurnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API