Legal Opinion
Conzelman v. City of Bristol
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 1, 1936PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The plaintiffs brought this action in their own behalf and that of about three hundred others, all residents and taxpayers of the defendant city, seeking a declaratory judgment that the entire grand list of property prepared by the assessors of the city for taxation purposes for the year 1935 was illegal and invalid and an injunction against the levy of a tax based upon it. The complaint stated as the grounds upon which the grand list was claimed to be invalid that the assessments were made in attempted compliance with the provisions of § 1142 of the General Stat utes, which requires a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Thames Manufacturing Co. v. LathropSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1829
- Sioux City & Pacific Railroad v. Washington CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
- Kane v. KaneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- City of Hartford v. PoindexterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Town of Middletown v. Town of BerlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Eastern Color Printing Co. v. JenksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Connecticut Coke Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Institute of Living v. Town of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Downer v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.