Legal Opinion
Downer v. Liquor Control Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 22, 1948PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.
The plaintiff’s application to the liquor control commission for a wholesaler beer permit for premises located at 54 Barbour Street in Hartford showed that the proposed backer was Liebmann Breweries, Inc., a New York corporation which was also the backer on a Connecticut out-of-state shipper’s permit for beer only. General Statutes, Cum. Sup. 1939, § 968e, provides that “no backer or permittee of one class shall be a backer or permittee of any other class except in the case of railroad or boat permits.” The commission decided that the permit already held by Liebmann was in a different class…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brewster v. GageSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Tileston v. UllmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Institute of Living v. Town of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Murphy v. BerginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Conzelman v. City of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Schwartz v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Cedar Island Improvement Assn. v. Clinton Electric Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Ruppert v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Neel v. Texas Liquor Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.