Succession of Smith
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Justice.
Plaintiffs brought this action against defendants, as legatees, to have the olographic will of their deceased paternal grandfather declared null and void, in so far as it attempted to disinherit their father, and for the annulment of a purported act of renunciation by their father of his father’s succession, and to be recognized as the forced heirs of their deceased father, entitled as such to one-third of their paternal grandfather’s estate, and for an accounting to. them by the legatees, under the olographic will, of their father’s legitime.
The defendants filed a plea of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cox v. Von AhlefeldtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
- Lagrange v. BarreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1845
- Foster & Glassell Co. v. Knight Bros.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Jordan v. FilmoreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
- Choppin v. DauphinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Succession of FertelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
- Himel v. ConnelySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Schoen v. BurnsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- West v. GajdzikLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Roach v. RoachSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.