Legal Opinion

State v. Spicer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 10, 2008No. 04CR0085; A130801PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

Defendant appeals convictions on two counts of felon in possession of a firearm. ORS 166.270. He argues that the length of time that passed between his being charged with the offenses and his trial violated the speedy trial requirement of ORS 135.747. We conclude that defendant was not brought to trial within a reasonable period under ORS 135.747 and that there was not sufficient reason for the delay under ORS 135.750. We therefore reverse the convictions.

The relevant facts are procedural and are not in dispute. On January 16, 2004, defendant was on probation as the result of a previous…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. DavidsOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State v. BellahCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API