Legal Opinion

Tom Briggs v. Merit Systems Protection Board, and United States, Intervenor

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 11, 2003No. 02-3217PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Tom Briggs appeals from the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board granting summary judgment that Briggs violated the Hatch Act and ordering the District of Columbia Public Schools (“DCPS”) to remove Briggs from his teaching position. Special Counsel v. Briggs, No. CB-1216-01-0002-T-1, 91 M.S.P.R. 669, 2002 WL 523228 (MSPB Mar. 25, 2002). Because Briggs’s attacks on the constitutionality of the Hatch Act are not meritorious, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

A. The Hatch Act and the Teacher Exception

1. The Present Statutory Provisions

The Hatch Act prohibits certain government…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Elgin v. Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. McEntee v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  3. Reid v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  4. Philip L. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  5. Boyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API