Legal Opinion
McEntee v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 15, 2005No. 2004-3066PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
Mike McEntee appeals from a decision by the Merit Systems Protection Board (the “Board” or “MSPB”) granting summary judgment that he had committed violations of the Hatch Act in the conduct of his campaign for Mayor of Albuquerque, New Mexico. Special Counsel v. McEntee, 94 M.S.P.R. 486, 2003 WL 22136151 (2003). The Hatch Act 1 is the colloquial designation for the federal statute that prohibits covered government employees from engaging in certain partisan political activities. See generally 5 U.S.C. §§ 7321-7326 (2000). Because we discern no legal error in the Board’s…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Myore v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Global Computer Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Robert H. Arneson v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2011
- Charles L. Breedlove Brenda Breedlove v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2010
- Morrison v. ColleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.