Flint v. Luhrs
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of tbe municipal court of St. Paul, in favor of defendant, entered in pursuance of tbe findings and order of Twoby, J.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This is an action for the recovery of the possession of a horse. The plaintiff alleged that he owned the horse, that he was-exempt, and that the defendant unlawfully detained him. The defendant claimed a lien on the horse for keeping him.
The here material facts, as found by the trial court, are as follows r The plaintiff, on November 1, 1894, delivered the horse to the defendant, who was the keeper of a boarding stable for horses, to be-kept, supported, and cared for, and requested him so to do. The defendant, pursuant to such delivery and request, supported, kept, and cared for the horse…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cowley v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
- Smith v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
3Cited by5 opinions
- Denzer v. PrendergastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Continental Casualty Co. v. KnowltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Halsey v. SvitakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- McPherson v. University Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Hoiby v. Federal Motor Truck Sales Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932