Legal Opinion

Humbyrd v. Rosco

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1961No. 7923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUARK, Judge.

This is an appeal from a $1,000 judgment for plaintiff-respondent, patron, against defendants-appellants, operators of a roller skating rink. The gist of plaintiff’s complaint was that defendants negligently furnished plaintiff a pair of defective skates, that after plaintiff had called defendants’ attention to the fact the wheels locked on the skates, defendants did not give plaintiff another, or safe, pair of skates but purported to remedy the defect, and that plaintiff, relying upon such correction, started to use the skates again, whereupon one of the skates locked and the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Moore v. Ready Mixed Concrete CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Kickham v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. Wilson v. ToliverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  4. Williamson v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. Bartlett v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. David J. Dillworth Dorothy Dillworth v. Andrew GambardellaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. Niemczyk v. BurlesonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Bullock v. Benjamin Moore and CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Keaton v. GoodSpringfield Municipal Court · 1961
  5. Niemczyk v. BurlesonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API