Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 1, 1943No. 38517PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank E. Bartlett recovered a judgment of $1,500.00 against F.W. Taylor for personal injuries which Bartlett claims to have sustained by reason of Taylor's negligence, as a landlord, in voluntarily making repairs to the premises he formerly occupied as a tenant.

On appeal to the Kansas City Court of Appeals, 168 S.W.2d 168, two of the judges were of the view that Logsdon v. Central Development Assn., Inc., 233 Mo. App. 499, 123 S.W.2d 631; Davis v. Cities Service Oil Co. (Mo. App.), 131 S.W.2d 865 and Section 362 of the Restatement Of The Law Of Torts expressed the applicable and governing…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Marks v. Nambil Realty Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Kirshenbaum v. General Outdoor Advertising Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Paubel v. HitzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  4. Roman v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  5. Vogt v. WurmbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Berry v. Emery, Bird, Thayer Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  2. Baker v. Kansas City Terminal Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. Combow v. Kansas City Ground Investment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. Dean v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  5. Fitzpatrick Ex Rel. Fitzpatrick v. FordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API