Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Benjamin Moore and Company

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1965No. 8421PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUARK, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a verdict-based judgment for defendant-respondent in a suit involving personal injuries in the form of burns which resulted from the explosion of can of paint.

The pleadings: Count I, upon which plaintiff submitted, was based on implied warranty. It alleged that plaintiff purchased two sealed gallon cans of outside white paint from a local supply company. Such paint was manufactured by the defendant and placed for sale with the implied warranty that it was fit and proper for use, but that such implied warranty “was false and untrue and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Halepeska v. Callihan Interests, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Meistrich v. Casino Arena Attractions, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  3. McManamee v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  4. Miner v. Connecticut River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  5. White Ex Rel. White v. McVickerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Turpin v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Hightower v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. Day Ex Rel. Day v. Mayberry Ex Rel. MayberryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Strang v. Deere & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Eide v. Midstate Oil Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API