Regal Floor Covering, Inc. v. A. P. Construction Co.

This is an action of tort for conversion of carpeting, and for the same cause of action, a count in contract implied by law for recovery of the value of the carpeting. The defendant’s answer is a general denial and a denial of the plaintiff’s ownership. There was a finding for the defendant.

The plaintiff .claims to be aggrieved by the denial of four of its requests for rulings and by the admissions and exclusion of evidence. Argument was confined only to two of the requests which the justice denied. They are

*75.“3. The evidence warrants a finding that the plaintiff rescinded the sale of said…