Legal Opinion

Holden v. City of Eagan

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 30, 1986No. C5-86-55PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

The trial court disallowed special assessments imposed on the Holdens’ property on the ground that the improvements exceeded the benefit to the property. Eagan appeals and we reverse.

FACTS

At issue here is the extent to which three parcels of land owned by the Holdens and identified as 030, 060, and 070, were benefited by Project 317, consisting of sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer and street improvements. The property is zoned agricultural under the city’s zoning ordinances but is designated as R-III medium density townhouse under the city’s comprehensive land use…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Anderson v. City of BemidjiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. G. C. Kohlmier, Inc. v. AlbinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Southview Country Club v. City of Inver Grove Heights, Dakota CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DeSutter v. Township of HelenaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Buzick v. City of BlaineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API