Cuevas v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LYNCH, Chief Judge.
This appeal requires us to decide a narrow question: Does a criminal defendant whose federal sentence was increased based on state convictions that have since been vacated for the reasons here and who seeks to obtain resentencing on the federal charge have a claim that is cognizable under 28 U.S.C. § 2255? We hold that the claim is cognizable. We reverse the district court’s contrary determination and remand for prompt further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I
On August 12, 2011, Alexander Cuevas was convicted by a jury of one count of conspiracy to possess with…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Peugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jeremy Snider v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. HoskinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Omar FolkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Baez-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- United States v. TsarnaevCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.