Legal Opinion

Jeremy Snider v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 9, 2018No. 16-6607PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.

*185 Petitioner Jeremy Snider ("Snider") appeals the district court's denial of his petition for collateral relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . Snider contends that this court's en banc ruling in United States v. Stitt , 860 F.3d 854 (6th Cir. 2017) (en banc), cert. granted , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1592 , 200 L.Ed.2d 776 (2018) -holding that a conviction for Tennessee aggravated burglary under TENN. CODE ANN § 39-14-403, is not a "violent felony" for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act ("ACCA"), 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e) -requires us to vacate his sentence as a career…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Ramos v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  2. Ramos v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  3. Dwight Bullard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  4. Ramon Hueso v. J.A. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. Steven MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API