Legal Opinion

Coble v. Maloney, No. 089843 (Jun. 18, 1992)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided June 18, 1992No. 089843Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ORDER (#145) The motion of the defendants, Partners of New Haven Inc. and Robert F. Stickney, for summary judgment, having been presented, it is hereby ORDERED granted; for the following reasons

The plaintiff has filed no written objection to the motion or memorandum of law in opposition thereto. Additionally, the plaintiff filed no opposing affidavits or documentary evidence as the rules of practice require; P.B. 380; Cawley v. Schochat,21 Conn. App. 118, 121 (1990); nor did he make any request through counsel to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Campbell v. PalmerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  3. Cawley v. SchochatConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API