Trumbull Electric Manufacturing Co. v. John Cooke Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Maltbie, C. J., Brown, Ells and Daly, Js.1
1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.
Two sewers are involved in the facts of this case. One was built in 1906 in pursuance of a written agreement made by the plaintiff, John Cooke and G. C. Woodford for the “proper draining” of their lands. The parties agreed to pay the cost in certain proportionate shares and to bear equally the expense of future repairs. The plaintiff’s factory and Wood-ford’s own house were connected with the sewer. It emptied into a brook. Apparently it was used also for sanitary sewage, for in 1917 the state department of health notified the plaintiff that it would have to discontinue disposing of sanitary…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ives v. City of WillimanticSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Boucher v. GodfreySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Perkins v. Eagle Lock Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Stueck v. G. C. Murphy Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Nichols v. PeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hibbert v. Hollywood Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Lar-Rob Bus Corp. v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Connecticut Co. v. DIVISION 425Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Lyon v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Beach v. BeachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.