Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 15, 1907No. 15,118PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Brill, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Per curiam

While the first appeal herein was pending in this court, the defendant made a motion, which was heard on an order to show cause, to remand the case to the district court to enable the defendant to amend and renew its motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, which was to the effect that since the appeal was taken the defendant had learned that the plaintiff had assigned his verdict. The motion was denied and the order appealed from affirmed and the case remanded. (Supra, p. 1, 110 N. W. 97.) When the case reached *145the district court, the defendant made a motion for a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. Johnson v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Flood v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Callaghan v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. State Ex Rel. Perkins v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. In re JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API