Glorieux v. Lighthipe
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Swayze, J.
This is an action on covenants for title contained in a deed from the defendants, heirs of Charles A. Lighthipe, to William L. Glorieux. The breach alleged is the existence of an encumbrance in the form of building restrictions. This is said to have been created by a covenant in a deed for adjoining land made by Charles A. Lighthipe, the *200ancestor, to one Marsh, in which Lighthipe covenanted that he would not convey the land subsequently conveyed by his heirs to Glorieux,-unless the grantee should enter into a covenant of the same nature,…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Hancock v. GummSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Cox v. RKA CORP.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- McQuade v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Spring Lakes, Ltd. v. O.F.M. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- Genovese Drug Stores, Inc. v. Connecticut Packing Company, Inc., and Fotomat CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.