Legal Opinion

Silveira v. County of Alameda

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 2006No. A108702PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MARCHIANO, P. J.

Plaintiff J. W. Silveira seeks refunds of possessory interest taxes paid in several years to defendant County of Alameda on his month-to-month tenancy with the City of Oakland. He contests the years-long anticipated terms of possession used to calculate the value of his possessory interest, arguing that, under the decision in American Airlines, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles (1976) 65 Cal.App.3d 325 [135 Cal.Rptr. 261] (American Airlines) and for other reasons, he could not lawfully be taxed based on a term of possession longer than one month. We disagree with…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Kaiser Co. v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. People v. ShearerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Board of Supervisors v. ArcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Texas Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Glovis Am., Inc. v. Cnty. of Ventura, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Charter Communications Properties, LLC v. County of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Los Angeles Unified School District v. PulgarinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Glovis America, Inc. v. County of VenturaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API