Legal Opinion

Hickey v. Settlemier

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 18, 1992No. 90-1082; CA A69975PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Plaintiff appeals a summary judgment for defendant in this defamation action. The trial court granted the judgment on the ground that, as a matter of law, defendant’s statements were either true or substantially true or defendant had not published them. We reverse.

Plaintiff sells animals for medical research and has a federal license to do so. Defendant is plaintiffs neighbor. Defendant made the allegedly defamatory statements in an interview on the television program, “20/20.” The pertinent statements were:

“[Correspondent]: * * * [M]ore than 300 people in central Oregon have complained that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Ron Tonkin Gran Turismo, Inc. v. Wakehouse Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Chavez v. Boise Cascade CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Hand v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Dell v. K. E. McKay's Market of Coos Bay, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Thomas Dodd Doris Dodd v. Hood River County, and State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Lee v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Hickey v. SettlemierOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Hickey v. SettlemierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Volm v. Legacy Health System, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API