Hickey v. Settlemier
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.
Plaintiff appeals a summary judgment for defendant in this defamation action. The trial court granted the judgment on the ground that, as a matter of law, defendant’s statements were either true or substantially true or defendant had not published them. We reverse.
Plaintiff sells animals for medical research and has a federal license to do so. Defendant is plaintiffs neighbor. Defendant made the allegedly defamatory statements in an interview on the television program, “20/20.” The pertinent statements were:
“[Correspondent]: * * * [M]ore than 300 people in central Oregon have complained that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Ron Tonkin Gran Turismo, Inc. v. Wakehouse Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Chavez v. Boise Cascade CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Hand v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Dell v. K. E. McKay's Market of Coos Bay, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Thomas Dodd Doris Dodd v. Hood River County, and State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Lee v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Hickey v. SettlemierOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Hickey v. SettlemierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Volm v. Legacy Health System, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.