Legal Opinion
Burlingham v. Mintz
Montana Supreme Court
Decided March 16, 1995No. 94-291PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt
Appellants Candance and Alvin Burlingham appeal from an order of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County, granting summary judgment to respondent Gary R. Mintz, D.D.S.
Reversed and remanded.
The issue on appeal is as follows:
Did the District Court err by excluding appellants’ standard of care experts?
On March 21, 1990, Candance Burlingham visited Dr. Mintz for a check-up and teeth cleaning. Dr. Mintz determined that she needed further treatment. Dr. Mintz also determined that Candance suffered from temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain. On April 20, 1990, Can-dance returned to Dr.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Newville v. State, Dept. of Family ServicesMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. CristMontana Supreme Court · 1992
- Hunsaker v. Bozeman Deaconess FoundationMontana Supreme Court · 1978
- Spain-Morrow Ranch, Inc. v. WestMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. PassamaMontana Supreme Court · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gilkey v. SchweitzerMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- Valley Bank v. HughesMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- McGregor v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1997
- Huebsch v. PeggMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- Robinson v. Our Sisters of CharityMontana Supreme Court · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.