Legal Opinion
Valley Bank v. Hughes
Montana Supreme Court
Decided November 8, 2006No. 05-361PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
¶1 Charles R. Hughes (Hughes) appeals the orders entered in the Twentieth Judicial District Court, Lake County, granting summary judgment to Valley Bank of Ronan (Valley Bank) and granting Valley Bank’s motion in limine to exclude the testimony of Hughes’ expert witness. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
¶2 The following issues are dispositive on appeal:
¶3 Did the District Court err by granting summary judgment against Hughes on his counterclaims?
¶4 Did the District Court err by granting summary judgment to Valley Bank on Hughes’ promissory note?
¶5 Did the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Busta Ex Rel. Busta v. Columbus Hospital Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
- Unified Industries, Inc. v. EasleyMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- Day v. PayneMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Christofferson v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- McDermott v. CARIE, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lamm Ex Rel. Ira v. State Street Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Tin Cup County Water v. Garden City Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. Bobby CookseyMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- Dollar Plus Stores, Inc. v. R-Montana Associates, L.P.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
- AVANTA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. ShupakMontana Supreme Court · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.