Legal Opinion
Chieppa v. Krimsky
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 8, 1959PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge.
Petitioner has moved for an order (1) quashing a warrant issued by the United States Board of Parole, (2) releasing petitioner from the Federal House of Detention, (3) setting bail pending deter-rhinátion ■ of■ the instant motion, and (4) *339for such further relief as may be deemed proper.
This matter of first impression involves the interpretation of a parole statute, title 18 U.S.C.A. § 4164.
To be decided is the following basic question: Does the 180-day period made deductible from the maximum term by the statute for certain purposes apply not only to a conditional…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zerbst v. KidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States Ex Rel. Quinn v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Tippitt v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- United States v. Angelo Chieppa, Abe Ivicola, Anthony Petti, and Joseph D. PolverinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Hammerer v. HuffCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Ernest James Cox and Ella Doris RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Edward M. McConnell v. T.C. Martin, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute, El Reno, Oklahoma, U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Foote v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1969
- Jones v. JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- In re GilletteDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.