Legal Opinion

Brundridge v. Fluor Federal Services Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 4, 2001No. 20157-1-IIIPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

35 P.3d 389 (2001)

109 Wash.App. 347

Scott BRUNDRIDGE, Donald Hodgin, Jessie James, Clyde Killen, Pedro Nicacio, Shane O'Leary, Raymond Richardson, James Stull, Randall Walli, David Faubion, and Charles Cable, Appellants,

v.

FLUOR FEDERAL SERVICES INC. (formerly, Fluor Daniel Northwest, Inc.), a Washington Corporation, Fluor Hanford, Inc., (formerly, Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc.), a Washington Corporation, Respondents,

Jerry Nichols, an individual and his marital community, David Foucault, an individual and his marital community, and Jim Holladay, an individual and his marital community, Defendants.

N…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Adler v. Fred Lind ManorWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Witt v. Port of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. Witt v. Port of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Mount Adams School District v. CookWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Hill v. Garda CL Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API