Legal Opinion

Mejias v. Aleman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 16, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Karopkin, J.), dated May 29, 2003, which denied the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Matter of McM., 255 AD2d 515 [1998]; cf. Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]).

The appellant has not raised any nonfrivolous issues in his pro se…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In re Shandeia McM.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ingle v. IngleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Maakufu Taifa Allston v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Milman v. ShehupakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API