Legal Opinion

Milman v. Shehupak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 25, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

— In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Semen Mil-man appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Hepner, J), dated May 23, 2007, which, after a hearing, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute this appeal.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

*783We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Hodges v. HodgesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Bodouva v. BodouvaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Burke v. BurkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Lane v. LaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API