Legal Opinion
Chrysler Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 9, 1979No. Nos. 76-1569, 76-1575, 76-1576 and 76-1582PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge.
SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge:
In these cases, petitioners challenge the validity of regulations promulgated for medium and heavy trucks 1 by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) purportedly pursuant to the Noise Control Act of 1972.2 Because of jurisdictional limitations on review of these regulations,3 we find ourselves unable to rule on the merits of petitioners’ arguments save in one respect. That exception is their attack on warranty provisions of the regulations,4 and these we…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Recreation Vehicle Industry Association v. Environmental Protection Agency, Chrysler Corporation v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air v. PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Atlas Copco, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Atlas Copco, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Atlas Copco, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.